MATT DAMON on ELITE & NWO – Amazing Speech On This Evil World

Matt Damon, famous for his leading roles in three Bourne movies, Good Will Hunting, The Adjustment Bureau and many more, will probably be blackballed by Hollywood for his recent speech concerning civil disobedience.

Published on May 20, 2015

Transcript of Matt Damon’s Speech

“I start from the supposition that the world is topsy turvy; that things are all wrong.  That the wrong people are in jail, and the wrong people are OUT of jail, that the wrong people are in power and the wrong people are OUT of power, that the wealth is distributed in this country and the world in such a way as not simply to require SMALL reform, but to require a drastic reallocation of wealth.

I start from the supposition that we don’t have to say too much about this because  all we have to do is THINK about the state of the world today and REALIZE that things are all upside down.  And if you DON’T think, if you just listen to TV and read scholarly things, you actually begin to think that things are not so bad, or that just little things are wrong.  You have to get a little detached, and then come back and LOOK at the world and you are horrified.

So we have to start from that supposition that things are really topsy turvy.  And our TOPIC is topsy turvy, civil disobedience.  Now as soon as you say the topic is “civil disobedience”,  you’re saying our problem is civil disobedience.  That is not our problem.  Our problem is civil OBEDIENCE.   Our problem is the numbers of peoples all over the world who have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war.  And MILLIONS have been killed  because of this obedience.  We recognize this for Nazi Germany.  We KNOW that the problem there was obedience, that the people obeyed Hitler; people OBEYED. That was wrong.  They should have challenged and they should have resisted, and if we were ONLY there, we would have shown them.  Even in Stalin’s Russia we can understand that.  People are obedient; all these herd-like people.  Remember those bad old days when people were exploited by feudalism?  EVERYTHING was TERRIBLE in the middle ages.   But now WE HAVE Western civilization  —  the Rule of Law.  The Rule of Law has regularized and maximized injustice that existed BEFORE the Rule of Law.  That is what the Rule of Law has done.  When in all the nations of the world, the Rule of Law is the DARLING of the LEADERS and the PLAGUE of the PEOPLE, we ought to begin to recognize this.

We have to transcend these national boundaries in our thinking.  Nixon and Brezhnev have much more in common with one another than WE have with NIXON.  J. Edgar Hoover has far more in common with the head of the Soviet Secret Police than he has with us.  It’s the international dedication to law and order that binds the leaders of all countries  in a comradely bond.  That’s why we’re always so surprised when they GET together; they smile, they shake hands, they smoke cigars.  They really LIKE one another, no matter WHAT they say.

WHAT we are trying to do, I assume, is really to get back to the principles and aim and SPIRIT of the Declaration of Independence.  This spirit is RESISTANCE to illegitimate authority and to forces that deprive people of their lives and liberty and right to pursue HAPPINESS.  And therefore under these conditions it urges the right to alter OR abolish their current form of government, and the stress HAD BEEN on abolish.  But to establish the principles of the Declaration of Independence we’re gonna need to go outside the law.  To stop obeying the laws that demand killing or that allocate wealth the way it’s been done, or that put people in jail for petty technical offenses and keep OTHER people OUT OF jail for ENORMOUS crimes.

My HOPE is that this kind of spirit will take place not just in THIS country but in other countries, because they ALL need it.  People in all countries need the spirit of disobedience to the state, which is not a METAPHYSICAL THING, but a thing of force and wealth.   And WE need a kind of Declaration of INTERdependence among people in all countries of the world who are striving for the same thing.”




Republic Broadcasting Network

May 12, 2015

“The government is merely a servant―merely a temporary servant; it cannot be its prerogative to determine what is right and what is wrong, and decide who is a patriot and who isn’t. Its function is to obey orders, not originate them.” ― Mark Twain

How many Americans have actually bothered to read the Constitution, let alone the first ten amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights (a quick read at 462 words)?

Take a few minutes and read those words for yourself—rather than having some court or politician translate them for you—and you will be under no illusion about where to draw the line when it comes to speaking your mind, criticizing your government, defending what is yours, doing whatever you want on your own property, and keeping the government’s nose out of your private affairs.

In an age of overcriminalization, where the average citizen unknowingly commits three crimes a day, and even the most mundane activities such as fishing and gardening are regulated, government officials are constantly telling Americans what not to do. Yet it was not always this way. It used to be “we the people” telling the government what it could and could not do. Indeed, the three words used most frequently throughout the Bill of Rights in regards to the government are “no,” “not” and “nor.”

Compare the following list of “don’ts” the government is prohibited from doing with the growing list of abuses to which “we the people” are subjected on a daily basis, and you will find that we have reached a state of crisis wherein the government is routinely breaking the law and violating its contractual obligations.

For instance, the government is NOT allowed to restrict free speech, press, assembly or the citizenry’s ability to protest and correct government wrongdoing. Nevertheless, the government continues to prosecute whistleblowers, persecute journalists, cage protesters, criminalize expressive activities, crack down on large gatherings of citizens mobilizing to voice their discontent with government policies, and insulate itself and its agents from any charges of wrongdoing (or what the courts refer to as “qualified immunity”).

The government may NOT infringe on a citizen’s right to defend himself. Nevertheless, in many states, it’s against the law to carry a concealed weapon (gun, knife or even pepper spray), and the average citizen is permitted little self-defense against militarized police officers who shoot first and ask questions later.

The government may NOT enter or occupy a citizen’s house without his consent (the quartering of soldiers). Nevertheless, government soldiers (i.e., militarized police) carry out more than 80,000 no-knock raids on private homes every year, while maiming children, killing dogs and shooting citizens.

The government may NOT carry out unreasonable searches and seizures on the citizenry or their possessions. NOR can government officials issue warrants without some evidence of wrongdoing (probable cause). Unfortunately, what is unreasonable to the average American is completely reasonable to a government agent, for whom the ends justify the means. In such a climate, we have no protection against roadside strip searches, blood draws, DNA collection, SWAT team raids, surveillance or any other privacy-stripping indignity to which the government chooses to subject us.

The government is NOT to deprive anyone of life, liberty or property without due process. Nevertheless, the government continues to incarcerate tens of thousands of Americans whose greatest crime is being poor and brown-skinned. The same goes for those who are put to death, some erroneously, by a system weighted in favor of class and wealth.

The government may NOT take private property for public use without just compensation. Nevertheless, under the guise of the “greater public interest,” the government often hides behind eminent domain laws in order to allow megacorporations to tear down homes occupied by less prosperous citizens in order to build high-priced resorts and shopping malls.

Government agents may NOT force a citizen to testify against himself. Yet what is the government’s extensive surveillance network that spies on all of our communications but a thinly veiled attempt at using our own words against us?

The government is NOT allowed to impose excessive fines on the citizenry or inflict cruel and unusual punishments upon them. Nevertheless Americans are subjected to egregious fines and outrageous punishments for minor traffic violations, student tardiness and absence from school, and generally having the misfortune of being warm bodies capable of filling privatized, profit-driven jails.

The government is NOT permitted to claim any powers that are not expressly granted to them by the Constitution. This prohibition has become downright laughable as the government continues to claim for itself every authority that serves to swell its coffers, cement its dominion, and expand its reach.

Despite what some special interest groups have suggested to the contrary, the problems we’re experiencing today did not arise because the Constitution has outlived its usefulness or become irrelevant, nor will they be solved by a convention of states or a ratification of the Constitution.

Battlefield_Cover_300No, as I document in my new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the problem goes far deeper. It can be traced back to the point at which “we the people” were overthrown as the center of the government. As a result, our supremacy has been undone, our authority undermined, and our experiment in democratic self-governance left in ruins. No longer are we the rulers of this land. We have long since been deposed and dethroned, replaced by corporate figureheads with no regard for our sovereignty, no thought for our happiness, and no respect for our rights.

In other words, without our say-so and lacking any mandate, the point of view of the Constitution has been shifted from “we the people” to “we the government.” Our taxpayer-funded employees—our appointed servants—have stopped looking upon us as their superiors and started viewing as their inferiors. Unfortunately, we’ve gotten so used to being dictated to by government agents, bureaucrats and militarized police alike that we’ve forgotten that WE are supposed to be the ones calling the shots and determining what is just, reasonable and necessary.

Then again, we’re not the only ones guilty of forgetting that the government was established to serve us as well as obey us. Every branch of government, from the Executive to the Judicial and Legislative, seems to be suffering this same form of amnesia. Certainly, when government programs are interpreted from the government’s point of view (i.e., the courts and legislatures), there is little the government CANNOT do in its quest for power and control.

We’ve been so brainwashed and indoctrinated into believing that the government is actually looking out for our best interests, when in fact the only compelling interesting driving government programs is maintain power and control by taking away our money and control. This vital truth, that the government exists for our benefit and operates at our behest, seems to have been lost in translation over two centuries dominated by government expansion, endless wars and centralized federal power.

Have you ever wondered why the Constitution begins with those three words “we the people”? It was intended to be a powerful reminder that everything flows from the citizenry. We the people are the center of the government and the source of its power. That “we” is crucial because it reminds us that there is power and safety in numbers, provided we stand united. We can accomplish nothing alone.

This is the underlying lesson of the Constitution, which outlines the duties and responsibilities of government. It was a mutual agreement formed by early Americans in order to ensure that when problems arose, they could address them together.

It’s like the wagon trains of the Old West, comprised of individual groups of pioneers. They rarely ventured out alone but instead traveled as convoys. And when faced with a threat, these early Americans formed their wagons into a tight circle in order to defend against invaders. In doing so, they presented a unified front and provided protection against an outside attack. In much the same way, the Constitution was intended to work as an institutionalized version of the wagon circle, serving as a communal shield against those who would harm us.

Unfortunately, we have been ousted from that protected circle, left to fend for ourselves in the wilderness that is the American frontier today. Those who did the ousting—the courts, the politicians, and the corporations—have since replaced us with yes-men, shills who dance to the tune of an elite ruling class. In doing so, they have set themselves as the central source of power and the arbiters of what is just and reasonable.

Once again we’re forced to navigate hostile terrain, unsure of how to protect ourselves and our loved ones from militarized police, weaponized drones, fusion centers, Stingray devices, SWAT team raids, the ongoing military drills on American soil, the government stockpiling of ammunition, the erection of mass detention centers across the country, and all other manner of abuses.

Read the smoke signals, and the warning is clear: It’s time to circle the wagons, folks. The government is on the warpath, and if we are to have any hope of surviving whatever is coming at us, we’ll need to keep our wits about us and present a unified front. Most of all, we need to restore “we the people” to our rightful place at the center of government. How we do that depends largely on each community’s willingness to get past their partisan politics and blind allegiance to uniformed government officials and find common ground.

To put it a little more bluntly, stop thinking like mindless government robots and start acting like a powerhouse of citizens vested with the power to say “enough is enough.” We have the numbers to stand our ground. Now we just need the will.

How you should respond to a Jury Questionaire

Below is a letter written by a man who was mailed a Jury Questionaire in Washington state.  If more people who are presented with this Jury Questionaire to serve on Jury Duty were asking questions, it would do at least two things. 1) It would begin to educate county clerks, and 2) it would send a message that people are waking up to the fraud or at least the deceit put upon them. People, by Pend Oreille County imagenature, want to trust their government, especially that which is closest to home. They live with these people in their county and neighborhoods, voted for them, and believe they would not deliberately deceive them or outright lie to them.

It is encouraged that this be passed around by email for as much exposure as possible. Everyone who gets a Jury Summons letter should be asking these questions.  If you live outside Washington, your state should have comparable statutes.

For purposes of this writing, we’ll just call this gentleman, Robert Openzeyes.

Subj:  Jury Summons

Ms. Ownbey:

I Robert Openzeyes, a living man on Pend Oreille County Washington, have received a Jury Summons from your office.

After carefully and fully reading both sides of the form as instructed, it has come to my attention that I do not understand how to fill this form out.   I have some questions which I believe should be answered before this living man can enter into contract with the County of Pend Oreille Superior Court as the heading infers.  The return address on the Jury Summons infers the correspondence is from the Pend Oreille County Clerk.  On the actual summons on the reverse side, the title is State of Washington, County of Pend Oreille Superior Court.  This is quite confusing to me since the Revised Code of Washington (RCW,s) states:  “RCW 36.01.020 Corporate nameThe name of a county, designated by law, is its corporate name, and it must be known and designated thereby in all actions and proceedings touching its corporate rights, property, and duties.” [Underlined emphasis added]  Obviously these are two different entities in reference to your RCW 36.01.020.

Could you please enlighten me on the following questions.

  1. Why does the summons contain the corporate name PEND OREILLE COUNTY CLERK on one side of the form and the corporate name County of Pend Oreille Superior Court on the reverse side?
  2. Are these two different entities PEND OREILLE COUNTY, and County of Pend Oreille?
  3. By using the abbreviation WA instead of Wash. [see Editor’s Note 3] does this mean this Jury Summons was sent from a Federal State (Territory) created by the Buck Act 4 U.S.C. § 110(d) instead of a state of the Union as recognized by the constitution for the united states of America?On the Jury Summons form the question is asked, “Have you ever been a victim of a crime?  I would have to answer ‘Yes”.  What crime?  Driving while license suspended (DWLS) by the STATE OF WASHINGTON which appears to be operating as a de-facto government.”

De facto government.  One that maintains itself by a display of force against the will of the rightful legal government and is successful, at least temporarily, in overturning the institutions of the rightful legal government by setting up its own in lieu thereof.  Wortham v. Walker, 133 Tex. 255, 1328 S.W.2d 1138, 1145.

  1. Would I the living man fall into harms way by answering this question honestly? On the Jury Summons form the question is asked, “Ever been a party to a lawsuit? Would this include a lawsuit being brought against this living man from an entity called the STATE OF WASHINGTON (De facto)?

Under the QUALIFICATIONS, the question is asked.  Are you a citizen of the United States?  There are no definitions provided as to what this pertains to.  I am sure you are fully aware there are two different citizenships one can assume under the republican form of government.  To the best of my knowledge the republican form of government is the only form of government that has lawful authority to exist. [See Editor’s Note 4]

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the other, is well established y the decisions of the courts of this country.”  Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927).

“Technically, there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States…Consequently, one who is created a citizen of the United States, is certainly not made a citizen of any particular State.  It follows, that as it is only the citizens of the State who are entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens of the several States…then a distinction both in name and privileges is made to exist between citizens of the United States ex vi termini, and citizens of the several states.  To the former no privileges or immunities are granted;”  Ex Parte-Frank Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855).

“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the United States and one of the state”.  Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 ala. 155; 48 So. 788 (1909)

5.  If a living man answered yes on the Jury Summons declaring to be a citizen of the United States, would the living man be declaring he is a created entity (citizen, person) created by the an entity known as the United States government, an entity created by the people of the union of states (people)?

Under the QUALIFICATIONS the question is asked. Are you a resident of this County?

Blacks Law 6th Edition.  Resident – Any person who occupies a dwelling within the State, has a present intent to remain within the State for a period of time, and manifests the genuineness of that intent by establishing an ongoing physical presence within the State together with indicia that has presence within the State is something other than merely transitory in nature.  The word “resident” when used as a noun, means a dweller, habitant or occupant: one who resides or dwells in a place for a period of more, or less, duration; it signifies one having a residence or one who resides or abides.  Hanson v. P.A. Peterson Home Ass’n, 35 Ill. App2d 134, 182 N.E.2d 237, 240.  Word “resident” has many meanings in law, largely determined by statutory context in which it is used.  Kelm v. Carlson, C.A. Ohio, 473 F.2d 1267, 1271.

-Your RCW 82.04.200, “In this state”, “within this state”:  “In this state or “within this state” includes all federal areas lying within the exterior boundaries of the state. [See Editor’s Note 5]

6.  By this living man declaring on the Jury Summons form he is a resident of the county, would he be declaring he is “in this state” or “within this state” per RCW 82.04.200 which is a federal area, which some might assume the living man is a federal citizen, a created citizen of the Federal government?

These are just a few of the question which have come to mind, I realize you must be very busy, and I do not wish to make this to long.  I would sincerely appreciate your timely response to this letter. I want to perform my duty and serve on a common law jury [See Editor’s Note 6] in accordance with the Constitution for the united states of America, but felt it necessary for some of the language to be clarified before signing a document of which I am not sure of what it is asking or how the words are being used.

If you have any questions I may be contacted at XXX-XXX-XXXX.


Robert Openzeyes


Editor’s Note 3: Years ago when this Editor received a Certificate of Existence for a Corporation Sole filed with the STATE OF WASHINGTON, they used the abbreviation “WA” on the document and I addressed this and demanded it be replaced with the true abbreviation for Washington, “Wash.”. They flatly refused to make the change stating that the postal designation of WA was an approved and accepted abbreviation for Washington.

Editor’s Note 4: Constitution, Section 4: Clause 1: Republican government: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.

Editor’s Note 5: The term “includes” is generally a term of limitation. Best described in this manner, Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others. Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 1 69 S.W.2d 32 1 , 325.

This is an important concept to grasp: What is not included in a statute is therefore excluded. In RCW 82.04.200 “”In this state” or “within this state” includes all federal areas lying within the exterior boundaries of the state.” Every time those phrases “In this state” or “within this state” are used in a statute means a federal areas. In other words every county is a federal territory/area.

Editor’s Note 6: RCW 4.04.010 Extent to which common law prevails. “The common law, so far as it is not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States, or of the state of Washington nor incompatible with the institutions and condition of society in this state, shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this state.

When you get to the purest form of this statute as underlined above, “The common law shall be the rule of decision in all the courts of this state”, you have common law courts on the jurisdiction of the land. If my understanding is correct, when legislators and code writers added the gobbledegoop between the commas, the intent was changed to a federal territorial jurisdiction “in this state” and into the jurisdiction of the sea of which the common law is replaced by Admiralty law.

The Fourteenth Amendment Hoax – Judge Anna von Reitz Exposes the Fraudulent Congress

Scanned Retina - A Resource for the People!

Once in a while I take time to reply to especially wrong-headed and misinformed individuals.

In this case, I was replying to a man who was convinced that the Fourteenth Amendment was the best thing since sliced bread and even Biblically sanctioned.

First, let’s begin with some facts about the various “Constitutions” involved. The actual Equity Contract that created the Federal United States is called “The Constitution for the united States of America”. It hasn’t been amended since 1860. It is a tri-lateral international treaty. It doesn’t have a Fourteenth Amendment.

Circa 1868 a Delaware Corporation doing business as the “United States of America (Inc.)

Voila_Capture 2015-04-12_07-31-31_PM

published its own “constitution”— a corporate charter deceptively named “the Constitution of the United States of America”. It was not only similarly and deceptively named, it adopted the Articles of the actual Constitution as corporate “Articles” and the Amendments as corporate By-laws…

View original post 2,701 more words

Corruption and Cover up at Washington State Auditor’s Office – the Untold Story


Wanted, one or more investigative reporters to expose the criminal conduct and cover-up inside the Washington State Auditor’s Office.

The State Auditor’s Office, most recently under the leadership of Troy Kelley, has been engaged in what is believed to be a criminal cover-up. The Washington State Legislature has mandated Filing Fees for official documents required by law to be filed. The State Auditor’s office has turned a blind eye while hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of dollars of these mandatory fees are not being collected by county auditors. Somewhere in the neighborhood of 40% of all those uncollected fees are earmarked for the eradication of homeless.

“All such other papers or writing as are required by law to be recorded and such as are required by law to be filed” RCW 65.04.030(3), must be “incorporate[ed] into the official public records” RCW 65.04.015, “using a process that has been tested and approved for the intended purpose by the state archivist RCW 65.04.040. Each document must have a unique Auditor or Recording Officer File number RCW 65.04.015(4), with the requisite fee paid RCW 65.04.130.

Where is the law that exempts County Auditors from collecting filing fees from elected and appointed county officers for Appointments and Oaths of Office and thus thwarting the legislative efforts to eradicate homelessness? We have asked that question and have been met with silence. [Video]

Where is the law that exempts the State Auditor from collecting mandatory filing fees for state officers who are required to file Appointments and Oaths of Office? No one will produce evidence of such exemption.

The Maxim of Law states “What does not appear, does not exist”.

Why is the STATE AUDITOR not doing his job? Is he not responsible for “…– overseeing other government agencies and offices to determine whether they are following all federal and state laws and proper accounting practices”? [See Jury indicts state auditor on fraud, tax charges ]

While Troy Kelley may have been indicted for business matters prior to elective office as State Auditor, has anyone asked why the immediate demand Kelley resign? Could it be that they want him out of office before anyone investigates what was going on inside the State Auditor’s office under Kelley’s tenure?

Corruption and cover up in the State Auditor’s Office  – the story yet to be told.


Jury indicts state auditor on fraud, tax charges

April. 17, 2015

“In 2012, Kelley was elected state auditor – overseeing other government agencies and offices to determine whether they are following all federal and state laws and proper accounting practices.”

We the People of Stevens County have sent a letter to Governor Jay Inslee, (See attached) with copy to Troy Kelley, Washington State Auditor. Each email addressee is receiving this correspondence to Inslee with exhibits of the deceit and law breaking at both the county and state level.

Contact:  Send email inquiry for interviews, written correspondences, and documents regarding the State Auditor’s handling of these issues to: Website is

Here is the letter and exhibits sent to Jay Inslee, Washington’s governor.

While Evils Are Sufferable…Criminal Activity in Public Office is Not!

“…and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.” –Declaration of Independence

To be content to pretend and deny that corruption and unjust court systems are not rampant across America is tantamount to being comfortable with your eyes full of sand. When Bill Windsor of Lawless America – the Movie, traveled to all 50 states interviewing hundreds perhaps thousands of people who sought a balance public forum to redress their grievances with the out-of-control judicial system, he quickly became a target by the system he sought to expose.  Harassed and jailed for a time, both Texas and Montana would like to put him away for life, according to his website Windsor has posted hundreds of video clips of his interviews on his Youtube Channel.

Does judicial corruption exist in your county? Spend some time in the courtrooms and the hallways of your local county courthouse as an objective observer to the proceedings. Witness the people in tears as their children are ripped from their their lives by overreaching and abusive persons operating under the protections of the bureaucracies and agencies they populate. Watch people stripped of their businesses and livelihood for exercising their religious and moral convictions. Observe people being barred entry to their homes through “foreclosure” by greedy bankers who never put up a red cent, had no skin in the game, but were aided by corrupt judges willing to accept forged mortgage notes as evidences of a valid claim by the bankers.

In Stevens County, Washington, the people exercised their sacred right to peacefully assemble and investigate their public servants through their Public Records Act. As records were received, and examined according to the legislative mandates imposed upon the public servants, it was clear that they were none of the eleven elected county persons were compliant with state law. The people, through a series of correspondences began to require their public servants to prove their authority to sit in county offices and to prove they had a right to collect a paycheck from the people’s treasury. It didn’t take long to uncover a scheme cleverly crafted by public servants, namely county prosecutors who provide legal counsel to other “officers”, to exempt themselves from paying mandatory filing fees when submitting their required Oaths of Office for filing (see videos below). It is estimated that the state and counties treasuries are defrauded of hundreds of thousands of dollars in filing fees each election cycle by public servants who have granted each other this exemption without a vote of the people or legislative authority. However, the mere fact that they are non-compliant with state law is a violation of their “oath” they swore to uphold the laws and the constitution of the state of Washington. It’s ironic that the very “oath” they swore to uphold the laws and Constitution of the State of Washington was violated 1 minute after midnight on Dec. 31st following the election in November when they failed to “duly qualify” to possess the office. Operating outside the confines of the Constitution and laws they swore to uphold relegates them to mere usurpers of public offices they illegally occupy.

The people exercised their right to redress by notifying their elected county servants of their Non-Compliance with State Law, Notice of Vacancy of Office, and Directive to Answer to the People (sample). Each Notice or Directive was rebuffed with silence. The county prosecutor, Timothy Rasmussen, was delivered 76 Questions that Require a Response. These questions, most footnoted to law, statutes, Supreme Court rulings, etc, apparently hit to close to home. Rasmussen submitted a very public rant in his Prosecutor’s Journal/Corner that was published in the local newspapers. Mocking the people by likening them to a “slimy lawyer”.  Although every public servant has a requisite duty/obligation to prove their authority, the silence was deafening; for they have no defense to the truth. Having no defense to their failure to comply with state law, these public “servants” believed they could just ignore the people away.

When it was uncovered that the local “sheriff”, Kendle Allen, usurping the office of the chief law enforcement officer of the county, did not even bother to subscribe an Oath for over 3 years into his first term of office, let alone properly file it into the official public records, criminal complaints were filed against him with the county “prosecutor” who did nothing but scoff at the people. After the prosecutor’s rebuff, the complaints were taken to the Superior Court Administrator who mischaracterized the complaints as “informations” and the complaints again, went nowhere. Criminal complaints were executed against Timothy Rasmussen, county prosecutor, for Official Misconduct, failure to perform a duty required by law. The original Criminal Complaints along with a Memorandum of Law in Support were submitted to Washington’s Attorney General, Bob Ferguson, with copies and Cover letter to Washington’s Governor Jay Inslee.  Washington’s Governor and Attorney General were solicited to take action as is their duty as mandatory reporters of criminal activity. The Governor’s office, in an unsigned correspondence weighed in saying “the Governor will decline to order the Attorney General’s Office to use state resources to investigate your concerns.”  One can only surmise if it is a matter of custom, practice and policy within the Governor’s Office to insure no person can be identified or held responsible for crafting such a letter by sending it unsigned? The dozen criminal complaints filed by the people against Kendle Allen and Timothy Rasmussen have never been presented to a judge for a probable cause hearing and the complaints remain unresolved to date.

When someone usurps a public office of district court judge, every “session” is really a mock or moot court for no legitimacy can be lent to a person because they adorn themselves in black robe attire and deceptively sit in “judgment” over the unsuspecting. So, when a number of people entered the Stevens County courthouse on January 5, 2015, to redress their grievances to a usurper and imposter of the office of Stevens County District Court Judge, Gina A. Tveit, there was no legal court in session and thus no crimes could be charged against three people for exercising the sacred right of redress of grievance. Tveit, herself, has unresolved criminal complaints against her as well.


Left to Right, Thew, Ransier and Patterson exercise sacred right to redress grievance.

The three people, Dennis Patterson (56), Constance Thew (68) and Charles Ransier (77), the POC-3, are members of the duly elected People’s Oversight Commission (although this event was not a People’s Oversight Commission sanctioned event).

(See courthouse generated picture on right.)

 While the people have unresolved criminal complaints against usurpers Tveit, Allen and Rasmussen without any opportunity to testify at a probable cause hearing held for them, Allen and his deputies were quick to respond and “arrest” the POC-3. Every person who shall falsely personate or represent any public officer commits a multitude of felonies for a false arrest, i.e. assault with a deadly weapon, false arrest, false imprisonment at minimum.  The POC-3 were each taken before a superior court “judge” in chains for a probable cause hearing in a single day’s time after the two men were compelled to spend a night in jail despite none of the three ever having a criminal record. Yet the usurpers of county offices having criminal complaints against them by the people, are never brought to justice.

 Rasmussen, and his deputy prosecutors, had charges filed within days against the POC-3 for: (Count 1) Contempt of Court (Punitive Sanction) – Disrupting Proceedings or Insolent Behavior, (Count 2) Criminal Trespass in the First Degree, and (Count 3) Interference of Court; each a gross misdemeanor and each carrying up to 364 days in jail and/or a $5000 fine per charge. When the POC-3 are “arrested” and “charged” for alleged “crimes” in a mock court by the very persons they filed criminal complaints against, the unsavory stench of injustice, retaliatory animus, and/or conflicts of interest overwhelms the people’s nostrils.

 Although Stevens County has been taken over by usurpers of public office and the Governor Inslee and Attorney General Ferguson turned a blind eye to criminal activity; while criminal complaints against the usurpers go unresolved, the people’s resolve remain constant. There are people in Stevens County who are awake – they are not sheepeople, easily influenced by peers/media to adopt certain behaviors or blindly follow trends.

Public servants are required to live under the laws they swore an oath to uphold. Per people’s Initiative, in 1972, “The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies that serve them.” The people are also charged with a duty to “maintain control over the instruments they have created”.

There are people in other counties in Washington that ARE standing up in order to put down lawlessness, rebellion, sedition and tyranny by “public servants” at every level. Those familiar with Gavin Seim are aware of his Youtube Video Channel and his bold stand to restore liberty in America. He, too, has paid a price for speaking truth to unjust powerholders, having himself been arrested a few weeks ago in Douglas County Washington.

Those of you who are AWAKE, this is your call to stand with those standing up. Stand up in your community, in your county, for it is at the grass roots that change is most effective.

Only the people can restore America.

“In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot.” – Mark Twain


Tim Gray, Stevens County “Auditor” interviewed on filing Oaths of Office

Dennis Patterson speaks with Stevens County Prosecutor, Timothy Rasmussen.

Dennis Patterson holds Press Conference on Criminal Complaints filed against imposter “sheriff” Kendle Allen

Dennis Patterson holds Press Conference concerning Governor Inslee & AG Ferguson receiving Criminal Complaints against Stevens County Prosecutor Timothy Rasmussen

Jimmy Ellis, Clark Press Conference on Writ of Prohibition filed against Stevens County Treasurer, Auditor, and three County Commissioners

When the Right to Petition is Deprived by Arrest

Seeking to exercise a First Amendment guaranteed and protected right to peaceable 10cent stamp petition for redressassemble and redress a grievance led to three people living in  Stevens County Washington being arrested and jailed.  So what happened in Stevens County Washington? The People on Stevens County notified their eleven elected officials on April 5, 2014, that they were Non-Compliant with State Law (see here) and received no response.

 Again on May 27, 2014, each elected were served with a Notice of Vacancy of Office. (see here). None responded.

 In letters dated June 11, 2014, the newly elected People’s Oversight Commission served a Directive to Answer to the People. Still no one responded.

 When a correspondence entitled 76 Questions which Require a Response was issued to the occupier of the office of Stevens County Prosecutor, only then did the People get a flaming response.  (see here).

 One of the usurpers of county office was Kendle Allen, who occupies the office of Sheriff yet didn’t follow state law to taken an Oath of Office for the term beginning Jan. 1, 2011, until 3 years, 2 months and 12 days later.

 The people, who are charged with the responsibility to maintain control over the instruments of government they have created, have been repeatedly snubbed and ignored by an irresponsible and aloof public servants. When two newly elected persons won office in November of 2014, they did not follow state law either even after they were given a friendly letter notifying them of the obligations imposed by the State Legislature, in advance of taking office, on how to be compliant regarding their Oath.

 So, to openly punish the people for attempting to hold non-responsive public serv ants accountable to state law, the people were assaulted, falsely arrested and falsely imprisoned. Two had to seek medical attention upon release from jail, one for a nearly dislocated shoulder. Every elected person who fails to duly qualify, as have the 11 former and current candidates-elect, are now engaging in unlawful acts. RCW 42.20.030 expresses the penalty for falsely personating or representing a public officer as a gross misdemeanor (exactly what the three redress petitioners were charged with).

Most of you are aware that times are tough and a large part of that reality is that government not only has both hands in our collective pockets but is directly responsible for the collapsing economy that has deprived millions of people from jobs with which to support themselves.

 These redress petitioners are standing in the gap for their children and grandchildren, for you and your families, willing to put their very lives and freedom on the line; willing to risk imprisonment to make your cause heard.

 One redress petitioner has tendered a plea for assistance as follows:

 Dear Family and Friends,

     It will be some time before I have phone service. I will be able to check e-mail every 2d or 3d day.   I am beyond my wits end in the trouble I’ve had over the last 2 and a half weeks trying to maintain phone service (not to mention periodic issues with e-mail).  I’ve now been through 3 phones and its time to throw in the towel for now.  I am eligible for a free phone with 250 minutes a month but it will be a couple weeks before it comes in.

      Some of you are aware that I am currently at zero income and just can’t seem to get a job like millions of others. Sure the economy may be rolling again but it aint happenin’ here.   Since I lost my job with SNAP (Spokane Neighborhood Action Programs) in May I have put in 108 applications and had 4 interviews.  Fortunately I did get a private buyer for the house so the mortgage is covered for now.  I am back in the off-grid cabin. Thanks to many wonderful friends I am well stocked on wood and have been able to feed the car.  I had slowly built up a reserve food supply and am good for a couple months there.  Cross your fingers and pray the car hangs in there.  The truck has been in the shop for 2 months and they can’t figure out what is wrong with it.

     While I have been tight financially most of my adult life this is the first time I have had to deal with destitution.  It’s difficult to understand until you are in it.  So many things we take for granted–like the ability to just pick up the phone and talk to a loved one or be contacted by a potential employer. 

     I don’t think it is any coincidence this is happening while I am dealing with the most important issue in my life.  It not only effects my immediate personal freedom and that of the two heroic people who stood with me because they believe in our cause, my good spirit and intelligence in leadership.  The outcome will literally effect millions more. The issues behind our arrests are way bigger than we are.  We have been criminalized for exercising our right to peacefully assemble and redress a grievance with our county government by reading it aloud. (see U.S. Constitution 1st Amendment–not sub-section of sub-section obscure–teach your kids and grandkids because they are not getting it in public schools.)  We are being cast as dangerous people because of our belief that our elected have to follow the same law they hold over us.  You can see why reading the truth to the public scared the be-jesus out of them to the point they resorted to violence against us–they are socio-pathic tyrants wielding way too much power and control without accountability due to all the special immunities and privileges they have granted themselves.  Many of you have sensed there is something terribly wrong with our governments–this is it. We are exposing it.  Every revolution to make the world better starts this way.  Good people being arrested and abused for speaking truth to power.  When confronted by truth and justice Tyrants always resort to using their goons with guns.



Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has. Margaret Mead


If you are willing to assist these brave men and women financially for their defense, donations can be sent to:

Dennis Patterson, 5272 S. Wallbridge Rd., Deer Park, WA 99006 or to The People, Box 448, Chewelah, Washington 99109.

Thank you.